Benjamin James Dyer

Rumblings from the world of IT and eCommerce

Three Strikes?

Back in May you may recall the French government said “Oui” to a new and strict set of anti-piracy laws. These laws, which in my view are unworkable, allow a sort of “three strikes and you’re out” approach to piracy offenders. It’s simple; first a government agency dispatches a strongly worded email, then a letter. If the piracy persists, the pirate is disconnected from the internet for a year.

While I don’t condone piracy, I have some major concerns with the French policy.

As the recent Conficker worm has so aptly demonstrated, there is a large majority of the world that has little control over their IT infrastructure. Reports from France are already coming in of people being disconnected after hackers remotely hijacked their personal bandwidth. Stealing bandwidth doesn’t even have to be sophisticated. Most can be hijacked via unsecured wireless networks. France is proving it has the wrong law, targeted at the wrong people.

While many will be assuming this doesn’t affect them, that may be dangerously complacent. Anyone with teenagers will know that free music is a huge temptation, it’s also nothing new. Under these laws all it takes is a few downloads, regardless of value, and if you work from home your business could get some major disruption.

Thankfully the law is only in France. Over this side of the lake we are a little more pragmatic. ‘Les rosbifs’ surely wouldn’t be so silly as to adopt such an unworkable law?

Sadly not, governments all over the world are being put under incredible pressure from the RIAA (Recording Industry of America), a self elected quango made up predominantly by the “big four” (EMI, Sony, Universal and Warner). The RIAA currently has legal proceedings against BT Ireland and cable company UPC Ireland to force them to adopt the policy.

Even in the UK, Hull ISP Karoo has got into a lot of hot water by adopting this policy and enforcing it with some gusto. Karoo have actively been disconnecting users, forcing its customers into an agreement not to infringe copyright and charging for reconnection on the second and third offence. After a serious amount of bad press of what is in effect a policy of presumed guilt, Karoo has now softened its stance. The really concerning fact is Karoo has a complete monopoly in the Hull region.

All of this is happening in spite of the European Parliament rejecting the concept of a “Three Strikes” policy, as access to the internet is now viewed as a fundamental right. While the recently published Digital Britain report suggests that “there is evidence that most people who receive a notification stop unlawful file-sharing” it makes no mention of any proposal to curb piracy by limiting net access.

Hopefully the UK will hold firm and throw out these ridiculous proposals. However I am afraid to say it’s probably just a matter of time until our technophobic officials and litigation scared ISPs concede to the pressure of the industry.

Filed under: Web Tech , ,

Twitter for Business : Article for Jewellery Focus Magazine

Whenever I talk to businesses about social networking the first reaction I get is often a raised eyebrow and a comment asking me why anyone would want to read messages about what people are eating for lunch. Hopefully by the end of this article you will see how you can use social networking sites like Twitter to benefit your jewellery business.

To be honest I understand the confusion. Social networking, especially the ever popular Twitter, has turned us into obsessive cataloguers, recorders and diarists. According to Silicon Alley Insider, during April 2009 there were 1.3 million active Twitter users broadcasting approximately 3 million “tweets” per day – that’s a lot of 140 character messages!

Looking at my own tweets (@benjamindyer) I admit, many of them are completely pointless, I see something I like or dislike and I tweet about it. However, looking at the bigger picture, this conscious stream of information from its 1.3 million active users turns Twitter into an incredibly powerful tool, especially for business.

Fantastic examples of companies leveraging this information include Dell, Ford and the US cable company Comcast. These companies are actively engaging with their customers and can see and respond to what people really think about their products, brands or services.

So Twitter is a mine of information and you’re keen to start getting involved, but it’s important to remember this information is personal. Twitter users have consciously decided to broadcast their information and as such any business using the service must respect its users.

The good and the bad

Examples of companies getting it wrong are littered all over the internet. My personal favourite faux pas comes from the UK furniture company Habitat who arrived on Twitter last month and decided to spam the current ‘trending topics’ to get noticed. Trending Topics is a section within Twitter containing Tweets on the current popular theme. To indicate its relevance the standard procedure is to include a hash tag, as below.

@benjamindyer: Looking forward to the cricket #Ashes

Habitat’s Tweets however included a hashtag that had absolutely no relevance to the trending topic. This caused an uproar as suddenly discussions over the problems in Iran, Michael Jackson’s death and the film Transformers 2 were being spammed with Habitat offers as in the example below.

@HabitatUK: #Mousavi Join the database for free to win a £1000 gift card.

Habitat’s spectacular failure with Twitter was compounded by its reaction, to try to cover it up by deleting all previous Tweets and by sacking the poor Intern. Habitat did officially apologise, albeit a number of days later, but it was too late, the Twitter community has sprung into action. Popular user @DarenBBC started a worlwide hunt for the recently unemployed Intern with numerous job offers and rewards. The search is providing so popular on Twitter that in the cruelest twist of irony it has spawned its own hashtag, #HabitatIntern. At the time of writing the fabled Intern is yet to be found, the mob suspect a cover up!

The #HabitatIntern debacle has just hilighted to many the need for better policing of Twitter. Spam is becoming a major problem with automated ad bots poisoning the stream. As the popularity of a topic is totally a numbers game the trending topics list is always going to be a viable target for nefarious tweets. I fully expect Twitter to introduce a level of filtering or moderation in the not too distant future.

However for every horror story there is an equally good example of successful use of social networking as Comcast shows. For longer than I can remember the brand Comcast has been synonymous with poor customer service. In the highly competitive US cable industry consumer choice is huge and Comcast was heamorhaging customers. However Comcast in 2009 is a completely different animal, so how did it turn itself around?

One way has been to embrace social networking. Comcast has a presence on all major networks (Twitter, FriendFeed, Facebook, etc.). This presence allows it to pay attention to its customers. A quick search for examples returned hundreds of results of satisfied customers. In fact I had to really search for a dissatisfied one, whereas this time two years ago this would have been inconceivable.

One great example comes from Comcast customer @cc_chapman:

“Last night I made a snide remark about the lackluster quality of my HD picture on Comcast during the Celtics game. Comcast saw that and tweeted me back minutes later. This morning I got a call from their service center. This afternoon someone came out. Now my HDTV rocks! THAT my friends is customer service and how it should work all the time.”

Listening to customers

Listening to customers is an essential part of your business, but it’s a very scary prospect. Five years ago consumers had a fairly limited and one-sided channels for feeding back to a business: phone, email or letter. Social networking has turned this on its head and suddenly your customers can talk and interact with your other customers, discussing anything and everything about your business. You have to ask yourself, do you want to be part of that conversation?

However Twitter and Facebook are so much more than an additional customer service channel. Listening to your customers is essential, but listening to your competitors’ customers is research! One such example is Intuit, the maker of accounting software QuickBooks. Intuit monitors Twitter for mentions of its competitors’ products and often contacts the Tweeter to offer its own product or service. Now this is a fairly aggressive and it may not work for your jewellery business but its another example of using this mine of information.

Further tips for starting out with Twitter:

Find your customers

Before you go hell for leather into Twitter (or Friend Feed or Facebook) do some research. Social networking can be a time sink and to do it right takes effort, so make sure this effort is concentrated in the right place. Find out which network your customers use.

Involve the whole business and be human!

No one likes listening to a corporate tirade of why your product or service is the best in the world. In fact, just listing your world class achievement is a fast route to being ignored. Instead show off the human side of your business, mix up business and social tweets and let other members of your team have accounts too.

Tweet and Re-Tweet

Engage with others by rebroadcasting your followers’ tweets. This is called Re-Tweeting or RT for short. Not only are you doing your followers a great service by recommending other people’s content to your followers, but it helps build an eco-system around your areas of interest. People will come to you by engaging with others.

It’s not all about follower numbers

Don’t be disheartened if you only have a small number of followers. Unless you’re a huge multi-national, or offer a product or service with wide appeal it’s very likely you won’t have a lot of followers. Use this to your advantage: you can be lean and reactive and get to know the people that are following you.

Don’t take it personally

People often reveal their true emotions online and it’s very likely you’re going to find some less than happy customers. Don’t take criticism personally, and use it to improve your business. Whatever you do always maintain the higher moral ground. Arguing and criticising others online isn’t an attractive proposition for future customers!

Tell everyone

If you’re going to have a presence on any social network you need to tell people! Consider adding a Twitter link to your site and your @ username to email signatures, business cards or marketing content – make it easy for people to find you. Also consider including your ‘chatter’ on your website. Frequently changing content demonstrates you are active and it’s also great for helping your search engine ranking.

Use a desktop tool

To manage your Twitter traffic, investigate free tools such as TweetDeck, Seesmic or Twhirl. These utilities keep the high number of tweets manageable and have features enabling you to set up predefined searches and alerts (e.g. for your company name).

Twitter is hugely powerful, it has the potential to revolutionise the way you interact with your customers, so give it a go!

Filed under: PR Activity, Web Tech , , , , , , ,

.Net Magazine – Issue 191

net191cover130I answered the Big Question in this months .net mag, thorny subject this time around, as ever making friends is always high on my agenda!

You can find the original here.

Is it ever okay for web designers to work for free?

I know this isn’t going to make me popular, but let’s return to planet earth! Back here, our economy is in a mess, and the major banks, car manufactures, insurance companies, and many media companies are effectively bust. Money is tight, competition is fierce, cats and dogs are living together.

With that in mind, does it make sense to work for free to win business? Err, I think so. Spec work isn’t evil. It’s competition. Its supporters are not the devil incarnate, they are pragmatists. I totally understand the argument. Spec work can destroy the beautiful relationship between client and designer, but then so does going out of business. The rest of the world has had to learn to adapt, and work leaner and more efficiently. Why should it be different for designers?

Filed under: E-Commerce, PR Activity, Web Tech , , , , ,

How Are Your Customers Behaving?

A new post for Business Zone.

businesszone

Hop into my Tardis, I want to take you back to those heady, glorious, recession-free days of 2007.

Two of the largest deals that year were based around advertising. Google acquired online ad company Double Click for a $3bn. In the meantime, and keen not to be left out, Microsoft stumped up $250 million for a less than 2% share in FaceBook. Sure, these figures seem a little crazy today, but the truth is that online marketing really works.

Last year, online marketing accounted for 25% of total UK advertising outlay. Back in 2007 when those deals were going through, the British business was spending £3bn a year in this space. Now, in the midst of a recession, companies look like they will shell out more than £5bn. In 2008 Google made nearly $20bn just from advertising. That’s $50 for each man, woman and child in the US!

It is clear our appetite for online marketing is only getting bigger, but what are the current trends?

The hot technique at the moment focuses around behavioural targeting. In layman’s terms, you make your advertising more effective by targeting only those that are most likely to buy. It’s nothing new. There is a reason adverts for feminine hygiene products appear during Judge Judy and you don’t see them on reruns of Top Gear on “Dave”.

As a former website developer I used to spend hours dedicated to SEO. It is hard work and doesn’t always cut it. As a result, and especially in the world of ecommerce, PPC schemes continue to blow natural search out of the water.

Within this market Google doesn’t just dominate, it obliterates. However, if Google is Goliath, FaceBook is certainly making an attempt to be David. If it’s not doing so already, I believe FaceBook advertising will put a serious dent in Google’s finances. Looking at the HitWise reports for last month, one in every 20 UK web visitors ended up on Facebook. That’s staggering.

So, how do FaceBook ads stack up against Google?

I recently experimented with a five-day ad campaign on FaceBook as well as the more traditional PPC schemes of MSN and Google. This is my third attempt at advertising on FaceBook, and I am happy to report that it has significantly moved forward.

The very first thing to notice is the ability to segment your advertising into demographics. Usefully, the merchant I was testing this for had spent a lot of time analysing product sales and speaking to customers, and knew his core market – UK males aged between 20 and 30.

The budget for this experiment was low, but looking at the results, FaceBook managed to serve up ads a phenomenal number of times. In fact, I was frankly staggered that it was around one thousand times more than traditional PPC. The result is that both the average cost per click and the cost of visitor acquisition are significantly lower when compared with Google.

Diving a little into the results, I was very keen to understand just what had happened. Analytics tells me the visitors spent about two minutes on the merchant site. However the key stat turns out to be the percentage of visitors that instantly left the site, the bounce rate. Bounces from FaceBook visitors were 50% less than Google and 60% less than MSN!

The answer is simple; It’s all about behavioural targeting. FaceBook is delivering adverts to the most relevant people. No wonder Google wants to know more about all of its visitors!

So, looking back at 2007 again, maybe that $250M was the more sensible investment.

Filed under: E-Commerce, PR Activity, Web Tech , , , , , , ,

The Real Thing?

A post for Marketing Donut

logo

You can argue that the aim of marketing is to build momentum. You need to raise awareness and establish how people perceive your brand. Traditionally this worked well, but I have news for you — attempting to set perceptions is becoming an increasingly dangerous strategy.

You may recall a marketing campaign that had the sole intention of altering your perception of a brand. A soft drinks manufacturer who specialised in blackcurrant-based drinks had complaints about the sugar content and related tooth decay. This caused it to launch a low sugar version. It even had the cojones to sell it as “Toothkind”. The rebranding promoted health benefits and claimed four times the vitamin C levels of rivals.

The inconvenient truth proved the product wasn’t good for your teeth and one drink in the range had negligible vitamin C! This little oversight cost the company significant sums of money. But the real stinker was the “corrective advertisements” it was forced to run on national television.

It’s always been dangerous to try to build a false perception. Now the rise of social networking has upped the ante. There has been a seismic shift in our abilities to interact and talk to each other, and to build or rubbish brands that annoy us. We are the mob, and the mob is now all seeing. If you are bluffing, it won’t take long for people to find you out.

It’s simple; the quality of your offering builds the perceptions. These will be based on fact and customer experience, not marketing spin. Ignore this at your peril.

Filed under: PR Activity, Web Tech , , , , ,